In all recorded decades
past in America and over much of the centuries written of dog breeding,
serious dog breeders have always worked diligently to produce
"bloodlines." Americans are still inclined to fondly refer in slang to
their breeding programs as their " lines." These were typically direct
canine lineages that traced back to one or more foundation stock of
note. These "lines" remained consecutive as the decades pushed steadily
onward, with breeders adding and removing characteristics in the same
fashion as an artist adds and removes detail from a masterpiece in
progress. Sometimes that forward momentum came at a crawl and other
times in leaps and bounds, yet serious fanciers rarely abandoned their
"lines." In actual practice, bloodlines were only rejected when a deadly
defect or perilous plague allowed no other option. For a few breeders,
such disaster spelled the end of a life's work. The venture was over
insofar as they were concerned. Others found opportunities to begin
again with some related stock shared by a former pupil or two. The point
remains; dedicated breeders remained intensely loyal to their original
programs.
Each major bloodline presented a differing view of the standard while
all of them offered some presentable version. Every kennel or "line" did
its' own share of winning and staked-out a firm place in the annals of
canine history. Large or small, each one made a contribution, of that
there can never be any question or doubt. One could count on those
"lines" inasmuch as they were identifiable types, to produce dogs that
would in turn, produce more dogs that bore the distinct resemblance of
"the line." There was a notable, positive measure of consistency both
phenotypically and genetically. A common practice was for the next
generation of dog breeders (the mentored) to take up foundation stock
from two popular "lines" and create, much to their own and everyone
else's great delight, a "new line." Wisely mentored, talented
individuals found ways to bring out the very best of differing "lines."
Such efforts frequently made fast friends of longtime show opponents.
After all, both lines contributed to a reawakened success in much the
same fashion proud grandparents are spontaneously united. In a few cases
where the "lines" clashed and the new efforts failed, each side could
blame the other for the unhappy results. Regardless, a mutually
satisfying proposition resulted however the tossed genetic coin may have
landed. If one cross failed, another was attempted until success was
eventually obtained. The entire process was accomplished under the
watchful eyes of scrupulous mentors. A successful breeding program of
one's own marked the rite of passage for the past two centuries of dog
breeding in America until the most recent decades. Tendencies and trends
in dog breeding have suddenly taken a series of sharp turns. Times have
changed, yes, but times always do change while dog breeding as a hobby
is manifesting an entirely new face.
What shall we entitle this fallacious facade? Nobody I have the pleasure
of knowing at length in dogs is able to fully grasp this anomaly and
accurately identify it. Is this a transitional phase in dog breeding or
is it the wave of the future rendering many of us the tail end of an
ancient entity that will cease before our very eyes? The visible
characteristics of this incomprehensibly unorthodox approach to dog
breeding reveals first and foremost the loss of distinct "lines" as we
knew them. Subsequently and secondarily we note the rapid decline of
clearly identifiable variations within breeds owing to an apparent lack
of resolve to preserve known lines or even develop new ones for that
matter. Evidently, many of today's trendy fanciers may view dog breeding
as a sort of genetic 'smorgasbord' wherein it really does not matter
what one starts with or ends up with as long as it produces a winner
instantly. What we are witnessing is the rejection of the proven
practice of long term breeding from a particular line or lines in order
to manifest some version of the breed standard along with the essential
fine-tuning that it has always necessitated. I have personally noted
(along with many who have arisen from the traditional role of dog
breeding) that no apparent mental concept of the breed standard seems to
be required by this new generation of dog breeders. In its' place
resides the quaint desire to refrain from producing a show specimen with
any disqualifying faults or other serious refractions that might prevent
winning. If every critter produced by such breeders and their typical,
entangling alliances is entirely different in type, temperament and
structure from the next, this is apparently incidental if not amusingly
quirky - rather than appropriately humiliating. This recent phenomena
poses a genuine dilemma for the mentors currently addressing dog
breeders and doubtless, to our reigning judges.
Much of the murmuring amongst
longtime breeders and judges reflects the rarity of locating two dogs
with remotely equivalent virtues in any given breed, much less in any
class at a dog show today. There appears neither rhyme nor reason to the
breeding techniques being implemented. One might surmise from the
evidence presented that today's dog breeder expects to win at each
outing with every show prospect entered. Infinitely worse, far too many
are wont to sell as show prospects all remotely saleable individuals
from each litter produced without regard to consistency of quality or
future prepotency. Perplexingly overlooked is the simple fact that a
great deal of time has always been expended at home by serious, ethical
dog breeders planning, growing out and placing the majority of litters
who are not and never will be, show or breeding quality dogs. That's
just the way dog breeding pans out. Only the best were brought forth for
public exhibition. Every pup a conscientious individual produces doesn't
rate 'show prospect' nor should they all be considered as breeding stock
by virtue of the obvious fact that they share the same illustrious
pedigree. This lack of common sense (or excessive greed, if the truth be
revealed) is one of the primary factors that engenders severe anxiety
for longtime mentors who are valiantly risking their own reputations to
educate and represent novice breeders, just as their illustrious
predecessors once did.
It has historically been
stressed that no individual can successfully breed a line of dogs
without a very specific breed template in mind. Similarly, ethical
breeders have always been taught to conscientiously remove from the
breeding program all stock that failed to meet those criteria. This is
the foundational motivation behind judging dogs and the primary protocol
for assessing them in a show ring. Today's version of novice
unfortunately tends to reveal the stereotypical know-it-all who eagerly
acquires a dozen differing bitches from equally as many breeders (often
worldwide) and pack them right off to the top winning stud dogs in their
breeds. Such blatantly shortsighted behavior is still preferable to
nauseating scenario B. Consider the latter case wherein those same
bitches are bred to the most local and convenient stud dog(s) the
breeder can find or pick up inexpensively. The fact that these naïve
newcomers are frequently financially raped by what should be 'reputable'
dog breeders (especially overseas) is another issue entirely. Owing to a
considerable lack of deep thinking or just glaring ignorance, countless
modern breeders are more interested in health clearances than pedigrees
and show records than prepotency. Health clearances are marvelous (we've
promoted them for years ourselves) but they can never substitute for the
intimate knowledge that will reveal exactly which lines tend to produce
which defects. A series of health clearances achieved by a dog from a
line that has consistently produced those defects is like a rubber
sword. It's not going to protect your breeding program in the end run.
You may be inclined to disagree with this; but I would rather breed to a
dog from a line I know rarely produces a certain defect even though my
choice may have failed that test, than the previous candidate. Equally
vitally, an experienced analysis of pedigree quality and depth is vital
to the success of any breeding program. The inability to wisely
apprehend each of these invaluable tools and utilize them from the
standpoint of experience will render a pedigree little more than a fancy
piece of paper and health statistics and show records no better than an
interesting collection of facts. Widely available are wonderful books
and new programs designed to help instruct the breeders of this era but
again, I reiterate and strongly advocate; personal, individual
mentorship has absolutely no substitute. Only a mentor can personally
impart every detail of an intimate knowledge while role modeling ethical
and conscientious conduct. Successful breedership is taught not bought!
Herein lies my second key
point today. Until a wannabe breeder develops a specific breed
photograph (hopefully, based upon the breed standard) internally and
makes the choice to honor proven, worthwhile mentors who will devote
themselves to their pupils success, he will fail to create any long term
impact on his chosen breed. Today's candidates seem to compose a
burgeoning group of rootless competitors that buy dogs left and right in
each breed and hop right into the ring with them longing desperately for
winnersŠor, at least wins. Every year they sport new dogs, new lines and
a new look. It causes one to ponder precisely what happened to last
year's models! These people don't have the groundwork to breed dogs of
the merit they desire. Compare any such individual to another who is
championed by successful mentors and is blessed with the wisdom and
patience to actually heed their advice. Both individuals will output
similar amounts of time and effort but the former, self-appointed orphan
will nearly always struggle vainly and likely abandon the effort. Others
just switch from breed to breed, hoping for better "luck." Worse yet,
many become bitter renegades determined to regain their initial
investment one way or another. Perhaps the impact being sought currently
is a different one than that so admired in previous decades. If the
motivation is simply to "win, win, win!" and subsequently, "any dog will
do you," then our nation's mentors really ought to step back, take a
deep breath, uncurl their toes and fingers and let come what may. My
assertion has long been, "Big winds blow over," but perhaps in this
case; "Big wins blow over," would be more apropos. The end result of
each individual's efforts will eventually become visible in conformation
and performance circles and in the annals of canine history, as it
always has. However, the likelihood of this fast-food mentality (as
applied to dog breeding) ever producing consistency in type, temperament
or soundness is well beyond the realm of a slim chance and if it were to
gain foothold, we would be forced to concede that the days of bloodlines
and prepotent producers may be nigh over. These strangely inspired
opportunists will still manage to produce winning dogs hither and yon
but never two and three in the same litter. Moreover, such dogs will
seldom pass on the characteristics that caused them to win in the first
place. Flash-in-the-pan winners may even produce healthier pups in the
short term owing to the blessing of outcross vigor but in the long run,
the progress will not be sustained. It takes generations of working
through genetic defects to breed them out to a very safe distance, if
you know "the line" and what it tends to produce consistently that is.
It also requires generations to breed in virtues that will reproduce
faithfully.
Allow me to relate an
incident at this point. It's a true story so I hope all prospective dog
breeders will sit up and pay attention. When I was a teenager I worked
very hard for a lady who raised German Shorthairs. One day she informed
me we were going to clean a large kennel owned by a wealthy fancier of
the breed. My mentor warned me to be wary of the dogs and not speak
openly regardless of what I saw. The elderly fellow who owned the place
was no longer able to manage the operation properly but she also
insisted that he had been "an eccentric" all his life. In fact, that is
what everyone in our area called this man, "eccentric." Over a period of
decades the patron had built a beautiful, full-fledged kennel with
indoor/outdoor runs on a lovely parcel of acreage. Inside this brick
facility were special rooms designated to breed, whelp and rear pups and
even space for displaying show and field trophies. A small home on the
property had been provided for live in kennel help. Large yards to
exercise the dogs were overgrown while previously well-kempt flowerbeds
had withered away. In previous years they must have supplied a lovely
grandeur to the exterior. Once inside the kennel, all lofty expectations
fell desperately short. The dogs were as many types as one could ever
dread coming across in any given breed. There were tall ones;
short-legged ones, coarse headed and snipey dogs and not one that looked
remotely like the next. There were friendly, tail-wagging dogs kenneled
next to neurotic, circle-spinning, crazy dogs that would as soon bite
you as look at you. To tell you the truth, it was rather nauseating. I
had to seriously rethink the prospect of breeding dogs as a hobby for
some time after we finished cleaning the kennel and departed. That chaos
was the end result of decades of breeding based upon the incredibly
mistaken premise that "winning is the only thing," and little else
mattered. What cemented the dismal failure in my young mind was the
realization that the rewards (ribbons and trophies) accumulated over
those decades were rendered utterly trivial and meaningless by the lack
of consistent virtue in those dogs. This 'breeder's' efforts provided
nothing of value and in some ways, served to set the breed back locally.
He had accumulated a few, tarnished trophies and wrinkled ribbons but
nothing consequential was accomplished. If one can be satisfied with so
little then I will admit that this fast-track mindset regarding dog
breeding may be of an extremely limited value.
Here is another case in
point for those who feel personal mentoring should remain a lost art. An
individual whom had migrated from another breed decided to focus an
effort at linebreeding on the most prepotent stud dog of the past
century. Although himself a dog of many grand virtues, he possessed
equal and grievous faults that he managed to set into his offspring. His
main fault was a weak, round headpiece featuring a narrow, triangular
shaped muzzle (instead of the broad muzzle required) with its'
accompanying narrow, wry jaw. To a lesser degree, he was also straight
stifled. Without the meticulous, personal mentoring that should have
been provided in order to point out to this newcomer those serious
deficits, they became quickly overlooked. As time passed, this confused
individual concluded that the miserable headpiece that came to
characterize that breeding program should be promoted as a correct
feature for the entire breed. These dogs were widely advertised
throughout the canine world until many judges began to accept this
outlandish conglomeration of faults as an acceptable version of standard
breed type. This tragedy may not have occurred if just one particularly
prodigious breeder had been properly schooled individually regarding the
correct utilization of the breed standard and modern bloodlines. A
qualified mentor could have steered this novice around the immobilizing
point of blind ignorance. Those judges who fail to read and apply breed
standards and who judge by advertisement (familiar faces) alone do
purebred dogs an equal disservice. Very often, a simple lack of proper
tutoring is all it takes to instill a negative trend into any given
breed.
There are invaluable
concepts becoming lost to our recent generation of dog breeders. Either
that or the wrong shaped pegs are being pounded against their will into
the incorrect holes by the stubbornly ignorant for lack of other
suitable explanation. I cannot personally conclude that the dog world is
so lacking in serious, experienced mentors as it is deplorably void of
dedicated, loyal students who are determined to 'mind their mentors' and
invest more than their silly, petty funds. Rather, let them invest
something into the Sport of lasting value such as their time, talent and
devotion. I would cheerfully trade ten thousand of these ridiculous,
"Top-Ten-Syndrome" devotees with fistfuls of dollars for one modest,
respectful and loyal breed student. Moreover I would prefer one without
a spare penny. Such a prodigy will be far less wasteful with my precious
bloodlines than some exasperating, bill-folding biped that deliriously
suspects she can magically create a breeding program from thin air by
waving a few bucks in the right direction. Deluded individuals are
further inclined to believe that currency can induce lost bloodlines to
reappear intact at a moment's notice. I suppose that our longtime
handlers feel equally plagued standing knee-deep in so many upstart
"instant agents" who collect dogs to exhibit at sundry fees like garbage
men do waste from our sidewalks on a weekly basis. This miserable
misconduct readily explains what we end up with in our rings each
weekend! Am I suggesting that all modern dog breeders are hopelessly
sidetracked? By no means, only that peculiar faction that fit neatly
into the trappings of the disclosed package. What if you wish to succeed
as a novice breeder but dread falling into this pattern? How can you
identify the wrong track if you are on it?
Take the following
rudimentary quiz to challenge yourself:
1. How many bitches does
it take to produce a quality line of dogs?
a. Five (one from each
of the top names in your breed)
b. Ten (the above group plus one from each of the top breeders in
Europe)
c. Thirteen (one can never go wrong with a baker's dozen!)
d. As many as you can accumulate with the funds you have or can
finance
e. One good one from a reputable line
2. How many puppies in each litter are show prospects if you have
produced a typical litter of four well-bred pups?
a. Four (they all came from the same parents and the same pedigree)
b. Three (one is bound to be a pet and you have one pet home waiting
as it turns out)
c. Two (keep the best bitch and the best dog or the best two pups
regardless of consistency)
d. None of them until your mentor has helped you evaluate which to
grow out.
3. What actually
constitutes pet quality?
a. A serious genetic defect
b. A breed disqualification
c. A & B combined
d. Bad temperament
e. A, B & D combined
f. A mediocre specimen regardless of pedigree
g. Pet home waiting
4. What actually
constitutes a show prospect?
a. No genetic defects
b. No breed disqualifications
c. Showy, outgoing attitude
d. Loud color
e. Good legs this baby can really move out!
f. Pretty face and fabulous coat
g. An outgoing, outstanding breed representative with a solid pedigree
to back it up.
h. Show home waiting
5. What is the difference
between a "breeding quality dog" and a show quality dog?
a. Breed disqualification(s)
b. Good quality, poor temperament
c. Ugly head, sound legs
d. Pretty head, can't move
e. Great dog, lousy pedigree
f. None of the above. There should be no difference.
6. How many pups per
litter do you need to keep to maintain a bloodline?
a. Half the litter
b. One dog, one bitch...just in case one is sterile or does not turn
out.
c. The two best bitches
d. The whole litter, in case some don't turn out or are sterile.
e. The one pup that is better than it's quality parents.
f. How many bloodlines do you intend to work with at one time???
7. How many litters per
year do you need to produce to maintain your bloodline?
a. Two if it's an easy breed or five if it's a hard breed to raise
live litters out of.
b. Three, in case the first two didn't cut the mustard
c. As many as possible without sending a red flag up at AKC
d. Enough to cover all doggy expenses
e. One, if it's well thought out and carefully evaluated
f. How many bloodlines do you intend to work with at one time???
8. Why do you need a
mentor and why should he or she help you evaluate your litters
initially?
a. You don't, really. Take their good advice or leave it since it's
basically just another opinion.
b. You only require a mentor long enough to obtain that quality dog.
c. Anyone who will trust you with his or her life's work will
gratefully help you manage it properly. An ethical mentor will never
intentionally steer you wrong and will work hard to see you succeed.
Translation: your success is their success!
d. 'Mentor schmentor!' Anything she can do, I can do better already.
e. This is my third litter and I'm tired of growing out puppies. I
want something that will WIN and I mean, NOW!
f. Which mentors do you intend to work with now that you have all
those bloodlines???
9. What is the correct
definition of a top quality litter of pups?
a. None have breed disqualifications
b. None have serious genetic defects
c. None have poor temperaments
d. All are ideally marked
e. Half of the litter finished
f. One pup became a Top Ten ranking show dog (gotta' repeat this one
right away!)
g. The quality of the pups was equally distributed; the majority
finished, the pedigree was solid, and they created a permanent,
positive impact on the breed
h. Both parents are champions
i. Show homes waiting impatiently with money in hand.
The correct answer is
available in each category. Moreover, they are overt answers. Did you
quickly arrive at them? If you were regularly drawn to multiple choices
in each category and are confused at this point you definitely need a
good mentor. If you aren't sure whom to approach in your breed, ask
around at dog shows. (Forget the Internet, you will merely come out
showered with arrows!) Collect sufficient expert opinions to obtain a
consensus. A quality mentor can document considerably more than a decade
in their breed; will have produced many champions and one or more
notable producers of that breed. Conscientious mentors carefully monitor
the genetic defects within their lines throughout each generation and
can prove it. Such individuals will desire to mentor only serious
students, so please do not waste their time and break their hearts if
you do not happen to be one of them. If you aren't in this hobby for the
long haul, please get out now while the getting is good. Successful dog
breeding is about quality relationships, long-term investments, a
dauntless love for dogs and conscientious determination. If your ideal
hobby is all about winning and making a big name for yourself as quickly
as possible, you are harboring an incognito loser mentality and what you
really need is counseling. That's a strong opinion. If you decide to
stay, you will discover many more where that one came from. However, if
you really love a certain breed of dog and your heart's desire is to be
intimately involved, produce a line of healthy, happy, sound dogs from
proven bloodlines, then by all means find a good mentor or two and super
glue yourself to them. If you are willing to become a lifelong student,
can take advice humbly and gratefully from those who are willing to
share their doggy endeavor, you deserve a good mentor. If respect ranks
high in your personal vocabulary and you weren't born knowing it all,
you have the potential to contribute as a valuable member of doggy
society. Honestly, I cannot recall even one top breeder I have known
that succeeded entirely alone. One day you may discover that you are a
dog breeder of renown and qualified to mentor students yourself! You
will become absorbed in a worldwide community of dedicated, ethical,
compassionate people who have embraced you slowly but surely.
One word in admonition; if
you are in the process of being mentored and choose to intentionally
thwart prominent mentors who have taken you under their wings, the doggy
world can become a very cold and lonely place all of a bloody sudden!
(This is by no means a reference to honest mistakes which all of us can
and do make regularly.) I remember one of the first individuals who ever
mentored my husband and I. At a club meeting held in our home he hung
back after everyone departed and confided in my ear, "These new people
come in and they want you to help them get started. You help them and
they turn around and put a knife in your back so you can never trust
them again!" I cringed internally wondering if our club leader was on
drugs or just an overly dramatic sort of fellow. At the time I thought
it was a rather amusing incident. Years later I came to appreciate the
full impact of his presumably paranoid statement. Anyone who has been in
dogs for a decade is already mentoring newbies. It just happens
naturally for most of us. At that early stage the process is rather akin
to a teenager mentoring a toddler. A decade later there is a further
transformation and we become adults leading teenagers. In each mentoring
relationship there is mutual growth from differing aspects. That is how
this mentoring relationship should progress. It is at the initial
checkpoint that we are noting a bizarre glitch in the system, if you
will. Around the five-year mark those students who should depart since
they are unwilling to learn anyway, for various, insidious reasons -
don't. Instead, they tack up their own signs and go into business
thumbing their noses openly at or even more commonly, behind the backs
of their previous mentors. A few actually resort to destroying the
reputations of their former mentors as a boorishly pathetic hobby.
Reading every dog breeding
and genetics manual ever manufactured won't cut the mustard when such
independent students actually try to breed litters from various
bloodlines (especially those ridiculous, tossed-salad combinations
thereof.) Half the time, these mentoring dropouts retain the wrong pups
and let the outstanding prospects go, thus insuring their own failure.
Without proper mentoring, they are literally lost amidst a world of
pedigrees, canine husbandry and exhibition. Still, the foolishly proud
would rather struggle alone than face the music and apologize to the
honorable instructors they have grieved. I've watched such individuals
attach strings to every pup they sell in mortal terror of repeating
these dread foibles. A team of veterinarians will be less successful at
diagnosing the various stages and odd quirks of those lines than one
longtime breed mentor. In stubborn rebellion, these folks will rely upon
any opinion other than that of a qualified expert. The number of lives
of dogs saved by good mentoring is impossible to calculate but I would
suspect at least a dozen for each successful mentor. Which is why it
irks me to no end that some veterinarians treat all dog breeders like
dirt bags. Technically, we are on the same team and it is beyond certain
that we've saved lives their professional education and training could
not. Whether veterinarian and dog breeder or mentor and student it's
all about functional relationships. Lacking respect, no relationship
will function. Yet daily we witness supposedly serious students of dog
breeding or handling backstabbing their dedicated mentors!
Mike and I have mentored
newcomers to the world of purebred dogs for the entire duration of our
marriage. I can recall few instances I have been as emotionally wounded
by our own family members as I have by doggy individuals we chose to
mentor. Perhaps it is human nature to become too controlling over those
we mentor on occasion. We may overprotect them out of concern that
others will misuse them. At the same time we strive to help them avoid
making terrible mistakes. However, mentoring at this initially intense
level should never extend beyond the point at which the pupil has
actually advanced into a successful breeding program of his or her own.
There must be a clear distinction between manipulation and guidance.
Yet, release from quality mentoring can only be unwisely sought with the
first champion produced or in the first five years of breeding for that
matter. The use of poor judgment by the mentored is never as hard to
swallow as utter disrespect without provocation. Foolish as it will
undoubtedly seem to most of this reading audience, I sold many
outstanding, young show prospects to complete novices. I remembered how
difficult it was to obtain a quality dog. Equally importantly, I did not
want my dogs in large operations or breeding kennels, stacked in crates
in people's basements or garages. So I stuck my neck out and took a
chance on novices who kept their dogs at home, primarily as pets. Each
of them made verbal and written promises. Only a handful lived up to
their contractual agreements. Some of our mentored were extremely
successful (the patient minority) while others ruined perfectly good
dogs. One newbie we sold a quality pup to continually despaired that the
dog would never reach its' full potential. However, maturity occurred
precisely when I insisted it would and the dog finished with a flourish.
In fact, this dog continued to collect honors regularly until it began
to win on a national level. This apparently happy conclusion was
completely spoiled a short time later when I inquired to purchase a pup
from the individual hoping to regain the bloodline that I had disbursed
in order to more freely judge dogs. To my old fashioned way of thinking
I believed my request would be received as an honor by the grateful
novice, only to be quoted a price nearly twice that of the original
stock with potential strings attached! In shock over this scandalous
misbehavior, I was then formally advised, "It's only business and that
is the current pricing."
Whoahoahoaaa there, little
doggeez! Let’s pause for a moment and analyze the statement that selling
dogs is ‘strictly business.’ It wasn’t ‘way back’ when your mentor
entrusted you with their foundation stock! Moreover, if you claim to
bear any love for them whatsoever, dogs are never ‘strictly business.’
If they are, you are not a hobbyist - you are a profiteer and had better
change your “buy from a breeder” motto to reflect your grasping
mentality. Secondly, no student of a breed in the initial process of
learning should ever charge top dollar for any puppy because he
possesses neither the experience nor the credibility to back up that
price tag. After you have endured a decade or two and have produced
noteworthy, prepotent dogs that actually had some influence on your
breed and when you are able to scrupulously manage and predict the
general development of a bloodline as your mentor did, then and ONLY
THEN charge a reflective price. You did not breed the dogs of note in
those pedigrees that you are basing the outrageous prices upon, nor do
you even remotely grasp the full impact of the innate faults and virtues
harbored within those bloodlines. No photographs or second-hand rumors
will ever reveal that information to you. Only a trusting, experienced
mentor can offer those breeding shortcuts and such information will
never intentionally be shared with a fool. Following in the wise
footsteps of my own mentors, I failed to charge full price for a show
prospect until I had fifteen years under my belt as a breeder. We rarely
placed strings on any dog and only requested approximately five puppies
back in all those years. We did not ask pick puppy for a stud service in
those days nor ever required litters back on bitches sold. Our stud
dogs, when at public stud, were offered at fees reflecting the PROVEN
value of their get. There is a point that seems to have been reached in
our modern dog world where hard-nosed business principles have
completely overshadowed good sense and propriety. There are sufficient
dog profiteers outside the legitimate Fancy; we certainly don’t desire
any on the inside. Many dog breeders are visibly infected with a
self-serving greed that has eroded their essential respect for mentors
and minimized the true value of purebred dogs to such a degree that it
is reducing an otherwise fine Sport to a paltry game. The reality is
that the hearts of this generation must change for gracious, sensible
conduct to reemerge in our world.
In another frustrating
case, a sympathetic, longtime mentor tucked under her wing what could
only be described as an “iffy” candidate for mentoring. This student
came from a most precarious position having purchased breeding stock
from disreputable sources and selling it over a puppy miller’s network.
However, the student seemed bent upon a course of integrity and cleared
up the negative ties as requested. The candidate further insisted all
mediocre stock was disbursed and began health-testing the few quality
dogs on the premises. The mentorship ensued and the pupil was able to
finish a high quality dog of superior pedigree with the guidance of the
breed expert. Naturally, the mentor was contacted again in order to help
select the appropriate mate. The mentor pored over pedigrees of
available dogs at the request of the student until an excellent choice
emerged. At the pupil’s further request, the mentor offered herself as a
reference since the stud owner was quite discriminating. Suddenly in
midcourse, the pupil jumped ship and decided instead to breed to an
untitled dog with an incompatible pedigree. The motivations were
supposedly financial and for the sake of simplification. A very old,
mediocre quality dog was provided the pupil without charge from a
calculating source that only requested “a puppy back in return.” The
clever, second-rate breeder was thereby able to seduce the naive student
and acquire stock from a bloodline that was previously unavailable
without investing a penny. Moreover, an unwanted dog at retirement age
was conveniently disposed of at the same time from a sizeable kennel
operation. When the mentor was informed of this treachery, she replied
calmly and candidly, “If it were possible to breed high quality dogs
conveniently and cheaply, every dog breeder in America would be equally
successful.” Consequently, in both cases the mentors severed all ties
with these (sic) ‘serious students’ of their breed.
What other course can
ensue when mentors apply full effort and skill toward the success of
individuals who later proffer the proverbial “knife-in the-back”
treatment? One could wish to label these pupils’ sophomoric actions
“poor judgment,” but the greedy motivations behind them would swiftly
nullify those otherwise inert descriptions. These are but two examples
plucked from among dozens of graceless incidences mentors around the
country are reporting regularly, obviously increasing the number of
abandoned or dropout students each year. The only reward any mentor is
ever granted for his or her personal investment is the satisfaction of
shaping a successful and ethical patron for their breed. After several
such devastating experiences in the lives of longtime mentors, it is
little wonder so few will extend their time and talent to the
continually inquiring newbies vying for their attention. It is seldom
true that the dog world’s finest canine mentors are, as so commonly
characterized, “stuck up,” but rather that they have simply been burned
emotionally one too many times. If you are a student of a breed; please
don’t confuse emotional distancing with arrogance since they aren’t
remotely alike. If you would be mentored by one of America’s renowned
Doggites, you may find it necessary to prove your loyalty to them and
their dogs first.
“Bloodlines,” as we once
acknowledged them, are fast disappearing. The remnants of those
precious, former hardwoods are being sold as a commodity to the highest
bidders both here and abroad. In the place of the elaborate effort that
once hallmarked a lifelong craft one discovers pressed board covered
over with cheap laminates. Is it possible that the invocation of genetic
charting in some fashion has ended America’s reverence for bloodlines?
Or is it merely the saturation of equal amounts of greed and egomania on
the part of today’s foundationally disengaged crew of incoming dog
breeders that is to blame? The principles that have long sustained dog
breeding, as applied both intellectually and instinctively are clearly
on the wane. In direct repercussion, mentoring has become a most
precarious proposition for all who compose the framework of the Sport of
Dogs. Will educating breeders with the intact blanket approach resolve
these issues? We will be most fortunate if this program can manage a nip
at their fast wilting buds. If public education could instill ethics and
character this program could be deemed feasible, however, individual
mentoring (like the parenting role that it has always evoked) remains
the only practical, proven and effective means by which to tackle such
perplexing problems and that process is entirely dependent upon willing
and worthy students. It occurs to me that in order for a breeder
education program to succeed, there must be a valid mentorship program
firmly in residence. Recruitment for qualified, mentoring volunteers to
act as “big brothers” to novice breeders will prove absolutely
essential. No family is functional without diligent parents nor will any
breeder educational system flourish minus experienced, conscientious
mentors. If those prerequisites could be met, it still remains to be
seen whether or not there exists a sufficient headcount enrolling in
breeder education to salvage the future of an entire nation’s purebred
dog Fancy. |