|

By Dr. Carmen Battaglia
Breeding is no longer an “elitist” hobby and its
rewards as either a pastime or a profession are no longer a
well-kept secret. All this spells opportunity and hope for those
interested in breeding the purebred dog. Time, technology and
information have changed how breeders are now able to produce the
better dogs. Many of these are being driven by the phenomenal,
worldwide knowledge revolution equal in significance to the
industrial revolution that so drastically changed society for our
ancestors of the 19th century.
Today, a legion of computers with mammoth storage
capacity fuels the invisible network of the internet on which
individual breeders, organizations and universities post files of
data. The extent and breadth of this electronic material continues
to mushroom daily. With new resources and a growing technology, more
improvements are now within the grasp of more breeders. However, in
the midst of all of these changes one concern continues and it still
plagues most breeders. It is the quality of the information they are
using. It can vary widely.
One of the key steps to breeding better dogs is the
information they are able to collect about each ancestor. This is
called pedigree analysis. It is a process of disassembly - breaking
down the total complex number of ancestors into their constituent
parts (virtues and faults). Pedigree analysis, if done properly,
should show that some ancestors are better than others and that some
will carry traits that are desired while others will be carriers. It
should uncover the desirable and undesirable. This analysis should
illuminate and approximate the nature of the genotypes, which are
the inherited traits. The genotype is determined by the genes
received from the parents, one-half from the sire and one-half from
the dam. Tracking what is passed forward is the challenge. What
complicates the search is that most inherited traits in animals are
produced by polygenes. This includes: conformation, type, size,
longevity, disease resistance, temperament, speed, milk production,
growth rates, sexual maturity, and numerous diseases. Therefore, it
is not surprising that those who rely on pedigree analysis will
improve their chances of producing the better dogs sooner than those
who don't.
What makes this approach so useful is that it helps to
identify the essential features of a pedigree. In this regard,
pedigree analysis becomes a means to an end. If we stand back and
look at the process, we can boil it down to the reliability of our
research and how well we apply our skills to the process. As
professionals, we are expected to know the sources that exist for
our breed through the whereabouts of their peculiarities. We are
also expected to know the limits of the repositories and what is
imposed on them by the facilities who maintain them. In order to
achieve an appropriate balance between the use of articles,
materials and other kinds of related information, we must become
familiar with databases and where they are published. An integral
part of our analysis should involve the use of technology which
provides several types of portable equipment needed to expedite our
research. If used properly, they can enhance the quality of our
work. Digital cameras, hand held scanners, lap tops, portable
printers, specialized pedigrees and databases, all have become the
tools of those who work smarter.
Given all of the changes that have occurred, there
still remain a few problems that have not changed. For example, the
best hedge against failure is to know the breed standard, coupled
with the careful analysis of each ancestor. This coupled with
knowing what traits are most reliable when choosing the best pups is
what also helps to produce results by direction rather than chance.
Without these skills breeders cannot craft a breeding plan that
manages the carriers or concentrates the genes needed in the
offspring. The process of pedigree analysis and information
gathering when managed properly produces these results. Preparedness
is the watchword of the future.
In a general sense, we know that all good breeders are
dreamers. So let's take the time to identify our dreams and the
elements that will convert them to reality. In our society, anyone
can breed dogs. There are no entrance examinations and no rules or
penalties for those who don't collect the critical information
needed before they make a breeding decision. Nothing is required in
the rules or regulations of the AKC and no organization serves to
punish those who make mistakes. Any one of our neighbors can claim
to be a breeder. There are no wrongdoers. What further complicates
matters are the 78 chromosomes (humans have 46) and the thousands of
genes that each one houses. Inside each gene there is information
everyone is seeking. Another way to understand this problem is to
appreciate how a new individual is formed. Its sire contributes
one-half (39) of his chromosomes and the dam contributes one-half
(39) of her chromosomes to their offspring. Each time this occurs
there are no guarantees about the qualities or health of the litter.
Part of the dilemma comes when we consider that 50-60% of the best
dogs in most breeds are not owned by their breeders. This statistic
should be sobering to those trying to breed better dogs. What it
suggests is that the skills needed for breeding may be present, but
those for selecting the best pups are lacking. Anyone who
contemplates breeding should know the realities of what time and
experience can do to help in the development of the skills necessary
to breed the better dogs.
INTROSPECTION
Each of us knows deep down the unique talents and
experiences we can draw upon when selecting sires and dams. Ideally,
we should set aside a block of time in a quiet place - just to be
alone with our thoughts. We need to think and dream concretely about
our goals, visions, objectives, weaknesses and fears. This is a time
when we can appraise the present and decide on the future. In the
beginning, answers probably will come slowly and with some
difficulty. The first hour may sometimes feel awkward as we fumble
with little direction. So we try again and each time we try, we will
coax up more information that we have or will need. We cannot skip
this step even if we think we have already made up our minds. The
insights we garner from thinking about the problems we want to
overcome and those we choose to accomplish will soon begin to
surface.
Identifying the strengths and weaknesses of each
ancestor is only the beginning. The ability to work long, focused
hours collecting information in order to analyze a pedigree is one
of the defining attributes of a successful breeder. These
individuals do not burn out quickly and most work well beyond the
limit where others will become bored, disinterested or tired of the
project. Because most of the genetic disorders are recessive or have
a major recessive component, the identification of the carriers is
an important part of this process.
Experts agree that genetic tests are some of the best
tools available. They can help breeders to make informed decisions.
In doing so however, we must be careful that we do not produce more
problems as a result of unwarranted culling. For example, by
eliminating every carrier one could reduce the incidence of one
disease and increase the incidence of another by repeated use of
males known to be clear of the gene that caused the first condition
(Bell). Typically, this occurs when breeders skip the step called
pedigree analysis and go forward with their breedings before they
determine what strengths and weaknesses are present in their sires
and dams.
The goal of pedigree analysis and genetic testing is
to use information to our advantage. The following was taken from a
paper presented by Dr. Jerold Bell, a noted canine geneticist. “If
one defective gene can be identified, through a genetic test, out of
tens of thousands of genes it does not warrant the elimination of
the breeding animal. The better approach is to use carriers who are
of breeding quality in other areas such as temperament, performance
and conformation. These carriers, if superior in quality, should be
bred to normal-tested mates. If these offspring are tested prior to
placement, better decisions can be made regarding their status as a
pet or breeding prospect. The goal should be to replace the carrier
parents with a quality, normal-testing offspring. If a quality
offspring occurs and it is a carrier, it can be used to replace the
original carrier if its conformation shows an improvement over one
or both of its parents. Using this model, improvements will occur as
the carrier frequency is diminished. For these reasons, breeders
should limit the number of carrier-tested offspring they use. By not
having a plan to select against the carriers, breeders will be
selecting for a carrier frequency of fifty-percent which is higher
than most breed averages” (Bell).
Generally speaking, the frequency of carriers in most
breeds will exceed the number that are affected. As more genetic
tests are developed, there will be a greater chance of identifying
and managing more of the carriers. At the present time there are
approximately 40 DNA tests available for this purpose. This means
that the quality of our research coupled with pedigree analysis can
be used to improve our breeding decisions.
As more testable disorders are identified, breeders
will come to appreciate that there will only be a small population
of dogs that are, in fact, normal. This is not surprising given what
is known about the frequency of carriers in most breeds. What this
means is that by collecting and sharing information, coupled with
honest reporting, everyone in a breed can benefit. Those who take
the path of silence or become reluctant to test will place a drag on
their breed and will limit the usefulness of databases and
registries. In the end, the future will be in the hands of those
who take the time to develop their skills, use the new tools and
apply the resources available. They will become part of the movement
that practices thinking smarter, not working harder. They are the
new kind of breeders and they have arrived.
REFERENCES:
- Bell, Jerold,
Annual Conference and Symposium, August 4-7, 2004 Hyatt Regency
Hotel. Lexington, KY.
- Ostrander,
Elaine, Presentation at a Workshop for the AKC Directors December
13, 2004, NY, NY.
- Professional
Genealogy, Editor Elizabeth S. Mills, Genealogy Publication
Company, 2001. Baltimore MD
- Willis,
Malcomb, "Breeding Dogs" Canine Health Conference, AKC Canine
health Conference, Oct. 15-17, 1999. St. Louis,
MO.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
|